Frankfurt
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Monaco (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States (1.00)
- Africa > Senegal > Kolda Region > Kolda (0.05)
- Europe > Germany > Hesse > Darmstadt Region > Frankfurt (0.04)
- Energy (0.93)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.68)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Hesse > Darmstadt Region > Frankfurt (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- Europe > Netherlands (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Karlsruhe Region > Karlsruhe (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > Portugal > Braga > Braga (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Hesse > Darmstadt Region > Frankfurt (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Oceania > Australia (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- (17 more...)
- Information Technology (0.92)
- Education (0.68)
- Government (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Hesse > Darmstadt Region > Frankfurt (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore > Central Region > Singapore (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Graph energy as a measure of community detectability in networks
Böttcher, Lucas, Porter, Mason A., Fortunato, Santo
A key challenge in network science is the detection of communities, which are sets of nodes in a network that are densely connected internally but sparsely connected to the rest of the network. A fundamental result in community detection is the existence of a nontrivial threshold for community detectability on sparse graphs that are generated by the planted partition model (PPM). Below this so-called ``detectability limit'', no community-detection method can perform better than random chance. Spectral methods for community detection fail before this detectability limit because the eigenvalues corresponding to the eigenvectors that are relevant for community detection can be absorbed by the bulk of the spectrum. One can bypass the detectability problem by using special matrices, like the non-backtracking matrix, but this requires one to consider higher-dimensional matrices. In this paper, we show that the difference in graph energy between a PPM and an Erdős--Rényi (ER) network has a distinct transition at the detectability threshold even for the adjacency matrices of the underlying networks. The graph energy is based on the full spectrum of an adjacency matrix, so our result suggests that standard graph matrices still allow one to separate the parameter regions with detectable and undetectable communities.
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.28)
- North America > United States > Florida > Alachua County > Gainesville (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.14)
- (9 more...)
Active Inference with Reusable State-Dependent Value Profiles
Adaptive behavior in volatile environments requires agents to deploy different value-control regimes across latent contexts, but representing separate preferences, policy biases, and action confidence for every situation is intractable. We introduce value profiles: a small set of reusable bundles of value-related parameters--outcome preferences, policy priors, and policy precision--that are assigned to hidden states in the generative model. As posterior beliefs over states evolve trial-by-trial, effective control parameters emerge through belief-weighted mixing, enabling state-conditional strategy recruitment without maintaining independent parameters for each situation. We evaluate this framework in probabilistic reversal learning, comparing static precision, entropy-coupled dynamic precision, and profile-based models using cross-validated log-likelihood and information criteria. Model comparison using AIC favors the profile-based model over simpler alternatives ( 100-point differences), with consistent parameter recovery demonstrating structural identifiability even when context must be inferred from noisy observations. Model-based inference suggests that, in this task, adaptive control operates primarily through policy prior modulation rather than policy precision modulation, with gradual belief-driven profile recruitment confirming state-conditional rather than merely uncertainty-driven control. Overall, reusable value profiles provide a tractable computational account of belief-conditioned value control in volatile environments, providing a reusable, mode-like representational scheme for behavioral flexibility that yields testable signatures of belief-conditioned control.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.67)
- (2 more...)